The Louvre–Why Bigger Is Not Always Better

There is no doubt that when it comes to museums, the Louvre is the mac daddy of them all. A place so honking big that you could wander around it for forty days and forty nights and not see half of the treasures stored there. And therein lies the problem. The Louvre is simply overwhelming.

Most people who come to the Louvre for the first time make a beeline for Mona Lisa…I know I did in 2001. But she’s not all that easy to find. You have to go up some stairs and down some halls…and you have to remember that in Europe that what they call the first floor, Americans call the second. And the maps they hand you require an advanced degree in engineering or cartography to figure out.

Finally though, if you’re lucky, you find her. And most people’s immediate reaction is disappointment in her small size and the large size of the crowd surrounding her.

Once you see the Mona Lisa, you have any number of choices. But if you listen closely to the conversations around  you, this is what you most likely hear…

“What do you want to see now?”

“I dunno…what do you want to see?”

Frustration sounds the same in any language.

So if you’re planning a trip to Paris, why not check out some of the smaller gems…like L’Orangerie with Monet’s magnificent HUGE water lilies. Or the Rodin Museum where you can see The Thinker. Two of my new favorites are The Cluny with its fabulous tapestries and The Conciergerie, where Marie Antoinette was imprisoned before going to the guillotine. And, of course, my all time favorite, Sainte Chapelle.

I guess the bottom line is this: you don’t HAVE to go to the Louvre. It is spectacular…but chances are, you’re going to spend half your time there trying to find yourself on the map. And the one thing you don’t want to do in Paris is waste time. You can do that when you get home. 🙂


Filed under Travel

5 responses to “The Louvre–Why Bigger Is Not Always Better

  1. Pingback: The Louvre–Why Bigger Is Not Always Better at A Better Half

  2. Mother

    Cindy is right. It is overwhelming but a little pre-planning can help. There is a great website complete with virtual tours telling what wing, what floor, where the toilettes are located, etc. However, the D’orsay is a lot easier.

  3. The terrible thing about visiting the Louvre was not being well-versed in the painters. I kept going from painting to painting thinking to myself, “Gosh, he seems to have been very talented, whoever he was.”

    After I got back, I bought two giant coffee table books, one on the Louvre, and the other on the Musee d’Orsay. I would definitely be better prepared to hit those hallowed halls now!

    I’m so jealous of you right now. “Here in Brentwood,” we’ve had more of the same humidity and Waffle House. Live it up over there.

  4. hereinfranklin


    I’m back so no need for jealous thoughts while you’re dining at Chez Waffle. I do love Musee d’Orsay too. But from now on, I’m all about the little places.

  5. The Rodin Museum is my absolute favorite.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s